FOCL Practice Test

In George's case, what determines his criminal responsibility for Randy's injury?

1. Direct causation

2. Intervening cause

3. Intent to harm

4. Negligence

The correct answer is: Intervening cause

In assessing George's criminal responsibility for Randy's injury, the concept of an intervening cause is pivotal. An intervening cause refers to an event that occurs after a defendant's actions, which significantly contributes to the outcome. This is crucial because it helps to determine whether the injury was a direct result of George's actions or if other factors played a more significant role. If an intervening cause is found, it may break the chain of causation, leading to a question of whether George's actions could still be considered the primary cause of Randy's injury. For example, if Randy's injury was significantly influenced by an outside factor—such as a sudden medical condition or a subsequent reckless act by another party—this can mitigate George's responsibility by showing that his actions alone were not the sole factor leading to the injury. Understanding this context helps clarify how the determination of an intervening cause can impact criminal liability, making it fundamental in cases where multiple factors contribute to an outcome. This is why the nature and influence of intervening causes are often a focal point in discussions of legal responsibility.